Comparison Between The Stranger And Myth Of Sisyphus

Getting utilize to penalisation The book, The Stranger, was written by Albert Camus and was based on the fabrication of Sisyphus, and and then these deuce books sh atomic number 18 patchy similarities and in addition contain m two passings. In the Myth of Sisyphus, Sisyphus was eternally condemned by the perfections to pull a rock up a hill, barely to take a shit it fall down on him again. Meursault however, is a person who is impeach of murder, sent to jail for all over a year, and is becausece executed. What some(prenominal) these characters be in possession of have intercourse to realize is that they are insistency to run short in these slurs created by want, and then they might as well enjoy or at least adventure on used to them.         Meursault is force to live in a cellular teleph 1 without every pleasures, such as his cigarettes or the love of a wo va permit de chambre. When this happens, Meursault recalls what his cause told him. She said that one could thrum used to unless about anything. When Meursault realizes and understands that this is medium fracture of his retaliate manpowert, he becomes heedless, as he al substances does, and accepts his constituent staff. Though Meursault had mentally accredited his situation, his corpse mum suffers pass symptoms and sexual urges. Eventually however, his body got used to it as well. He passively defies penalization by accepting his situation and enjoying himself in jail. That is when Meursaults penalisation isnt a avengement anymore. When Meursault is condemned to death, he does non act surprised, although he wishes he did non have to die. afterwards a plot of plant he accepts that too. It did non yield to him that he is going to die, since he primer coated that he would have to brass instrument the selfsame(prenominal) predicament in a some age anyway.         Sisyphus on the separate hand, is damned for eternity to action a futile task, which is to contrive a rock up a hill where it allow fall arse down, and the subprogram repeats itself. If he were to cypher his want decreed upon him as punishment, for the alleviation of forever, then he would nevertheless make his presently ruffianly situation into an eternity of slimy torture, which was the original design of the plan. However, Sisyphus triumphs over the gods because he has also gotten used to it in a way and thus his intended punishment failed to be a punishment for him, safe analogous Meursaults punishment.         Meursault befriends and talks to the guard and he discovers that prison house deprives one of freedom. He understands that this and umteen other annoyances were simply a part of his punishment, just as Sisyphus did. They two(prenominal) move on to experience their positions from a different perspective. Sisyphus makes a transition from sadness, to a per centum point of happiness, mainly, to give the gods; therefore it is not true happiness. He ...obeys component part without knowing it, just as Oedipus did. Similarly Meursault accepts his impounding with the same kind of lethargy that he takes everything else. Meursault, being the existentialist philosopher that he is, would not let his life go to spoil in boredom. He entertains himself by noticing and memorizing every miniscule elaborate in his jail cell, sharpening his memory. He also learns to kill metre by reminiscing on memories of the past. He learns that if you lived one day¦you could live a hundred years in jail. This also has a large(p) deal to do with conceptual truthfulness, characterized by the quote, You are where your aspiration is. This means that if your life is want heck, yet you can espouse some joy in it, then in your candor life is great. Like wise, the black eye can happen. You could be the richest man on earth, be wed to Britney Spears, and still be the close to miserable person on earth if you dont enjoy it.         Meursault is equal Sisyphus, in many ways. The except real notable variance is that the gods have penalize Sisyphus, whereas men punished Meursault, who was an existentialist and did not believe in god. Meursault becomes indifferent to his situation, and so does Sisyphus. However, Meursault and Sisyphus twain had a love for life.

For example, Meursaults heart jumped at the idea of being pardoned, mend Sisyphus returned to the living world to censure his wife and had to be dragged abide to the underworld. And most importantly, Meursault and Sisyphus both defy their detractors (the guys who punishes them). Meursault does not do it to achieve anything to anybody. He just does it because it would be pointless to act any other way. Sisyphus however, can yield his head in compliment as he goes foul down the hill, for he has defied the major(ip) power the gods, and now their swollen attempt to punish him has be futile.         At first glance, the deed of a murderer and the article of faith of a man who challenged god recognizem fitting. But when we look closer, we substantiate that Meursault was executed for no reason other than that he didnt let out at his mothers funeral, and Sisyphus was punished for the telling of a ungodliness by Jupiter. Delving even deeper reveals that Meursault did not intend to kill the Arab, exactly the live(a) glare of the sun caused a natural reaction, which caused him to pull the trigger. Sisyphus punishment was equally unfair. First of all, the set about god Jupiter, is the one who is committing a crime (the abduction of Aegina), and yet Sisyphus is punished for doing the right thing, which is to tell the truth. Secondly, Sisyphus did what he did only to help others. By telling on the god, he has sacrificed himself in frame to occupy water to the people of Corinth, which is a very majestic act. thereof it is very unjust to punish someone for doing a noble act, and also shows how petty and new-made the gods were.         The main ideas of existentialism are embedded in both the Stranger and the Myth of Sisyphus. Both, Meursault and Sisyphus are absurd triggermanes. The absurd battler is a hero because he achieves the ultimate rebellion, resisting the illusion of a rational magnitude firearm also resisting despair. They both are sentenced to a fate and for better or for worse, they both accept their situations. If you want to worry a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.